Compare
Seven alternatives to food delivery apps, and who each one suits
Restaurant owners asking for an alternative to the delivery apps usually mean one of two things: a way to pay less commission, or a way to stop depending on a platform they do not control. The online ordering platforms and options below cover both, and none of them is free of trade-offs. Tuckly is one of them, described in the same terms as the rest.
The seven options
Each one is a real thing restaurants do today. The notes say what it costs you in money, effort and reach.
-
1. Your own ordering website
An ordering page under your name where customers choose delivery, pickup or dine-in and pay online. On Tuckly there is no platform commission; you pay your gateway's fee, delivery costs and a subscription. Trade-off: it brings in nobody by itself. You have to send regulars to it. Suits restaurants with repeat trade, a following, or walk-ins who can be pointed at a QR.
-
2. Phone and WhatsApp ordering
Free, familiar and already happening at most restaurants. Trade-off: orders arrive as text and voice, get typed into the till by hand, payment is a separate step, and one busy phone line loses orders at 8pm. Suits very small operations and as a bridge: reply to the WhatsApp with your ordering link instead of taking the order in chat.
-
3. The marketplace's own direct or white-label product
Some marketplaces sell restaurants a branded ordering page or a self-delivery tier at a lower commission than the main app. Trade-off: it is still their platform, their terms and often their customer record, and the rate is set by them. We do not quote those rates here because they vary by market and contract; read your own offer carefully.
-
4. Ordering bundled with your POS
Square Online advertises a free plan with online card fees of 3.3% plus 30 cents in the US and commission-free delivery and pickup orders; Toast's online ordering product says no commissions and is available in the US, Canada, UK, Ireland and Australia, with pricing not published in our October 2026 check. Trade-off: you are tied to that POS, and the fit for delivery and dine-in varies. Suits restaurants already on that POS and happy to stay.
-
5. Self-delivery
Your own drivers, whether for orders from your site, a marketplace self-delivery tier, or both. Trade-off: wages, insurance, vehicles and a dispatch problem at peak. Suits restaurants with a tight radius and enough volume to keep a driver busy. Tuckly assigns orders to your riders from the order screen; the details are on the self-delivery page.
-
6. Pickup only
Take orders online but let customers collect. No commission on your own site, no drivers, no delivery radius. Trade-off: you lose the customer who will only order if it comes to the door. Suits counter-service, cafés, bakeries and any kitchen near where its customers work or live.
-
7. Hybrid: marketplace for reach, direct for regulars
Keep the apps on for discovery and run your own site for repeat customers. Trade-off: two order screens and the discipline to keep moving people across. Suits most restaurants, which is why it is the default we describe elsewhere.
Side by side
Rough, deliberately. The point is the shape of the trade-offs, not a scorecard.
| Option | Commission on the order | Who holds the customer | Reach | Effort to run |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Own ordering website (Tuckly) | None; gateway fee and delivery cost apply | You | Low on its own; depends on your promotion | Low once set up |
| Phone and WhatsApp | None | You, in a chat log | Low | High at peak; manual re-entry |
| Marketplace direct or white-label | Set by the marketplace; varies | Usually the marketplace | Some; depends on the product | Low |
| POS-bundled ordering | Per vendor; Square Online and Toast state commission-free, with card fees and plan costs | You, inside that POS | Low on its own | Low if already on that POS |
| Self-delivery | Depends on the ordering channel | Depends on the ordering channel | Not applicable | High: staff, vehicles, dispatch |
| Pickup only | None on your own site | You | Local only | Low |
| Hybrid | Marketplace rate on marketplace orders; none on direct | Split | High from the marketplace | Medium: two channels |
Vendor statements are as published in October 2026 and change. Your own contracts govern.
Worked example
A neighbourhood Indian restaurant picks a mix
The restaurant does 500 Zomato orders a month at ₹480 and has 60 tables of dine-in on a weekend night. The owner wants to pay less commission but is not willing to lose the students who find the place on the app.
The mix that fits: keep Zomato on, put a Tuckly QR on every table and every parcel bag, reply to WhatsApp orders with the link, and request Porter riders for the delivered direct orders. Over a quarter, 150 orders a month move direct. If the owner's agreement takes a rate inside the ranges the press has reported for Indian platforms, say 22 per cent, that is about ₹105 an order, ₹15,750 a month no longer deducted, against a gateway fee of roughly ₹11 an order and Porter's trip fee on the delivered share.
The 350 remaining Zomato orders still arrive, and the students still find the place. The commission calculator runs this with your own rate.
Figures are illustrative and chosen to show the arithmetic, not to predict your results.
Choosing between the alternatives
The list above is more useful read as a set of questions than as a menu. Three of them decide most of it.
How much of your trade is repeat?
If most of your orders come from people who have ordered before, the delivery app is charging you discovery rates for customers it did not discover. An own ordering site, pickup-only or not, is the direct answer: no platform commission on Tuckly, your gateway’s fee instead, the customer’s number on your screen. If most of your orders come from people who have never heard of you, the app is doing its job and the better question is how to turn some of those first-timers into regulars who order from you next time. The guide to encouraging repeat orders is about that second case.
Can you physically deliver?
Self-delivery sounds like independence and is, in practice, a logistics business attached to a kitchen. Wages, insurance, a vehicle, and the question of what the driver does between orders. It works for restaurants with a short radius and steady volume: the pizza shop that serves four streets, the tiffin service with a fixed route. For everyone else, the realistic choices are a courier service where one is integrated (Porter, in the Indian cities it covers), the marketplace’s riders, or pickup.
Pickup deserves more respect than it gets. For cafés, bakeries, lunch spots and any kitchen within walking distance of its customers, a pickup order on your own site has no commission, no driver and a card fee of pennies. The takeaway and pickup page covers lead times and the ready status that make it work without a queue at the counter.
How much do you want to own?
WhatsApp ordering is the extreme of low cost and low structure: the customer is yours, but the order lives in a chat and gets retyped. A marketplace’s direct product is the opposite: structured and easy, but the platform still sets the terms and usually keeps the record. POS-bundled ordering sits in between, tidy but tied to that POS. A standalone ordering site like Tuckly is the option that gives you the menu, the customer and the terms, at the price of having to promote it yourself and pay a subscription rather than a commission. The pricing page says what that subscription is and what else you pay.
A sequence that works for most restaurants
Start by changing the WhatsApp reply: send the ordering link instead of taking the order in chat. Add the link to Google Business Profile the same day. Print a QR on the next run of bags or table cards. Leave the marketplace on. After a month, look at how many orders came through the link and what they would have cost on the marketplace statement. Then decide whether self-delivery or a Porter request is worth adding for the delivered share, or whether pickup is enough. Give it a quarter before judging it; direct volume builds in proportion to how often the link is put in front of people, not to how good the site is.
One more practical point about the mix: keep prices identical across channels. A regular who notices the direct site is dearer than the app will go back to the app and tell a friend. A regular who notices it is the same price, with no customer platform fee and their details remembered, tends to stay.
What to be sceptical of
Any option that promises to replace the marketplace’s reach. Any rate quoted without a date and a source. Any ordering product that lists “integrations” as a wall of logos rather than a statement of what syncs. And any claim, including ours, that a direct site will save you a specific sum; it saves you the commission on the orders that actually move, and how many move is up to you and your customers.
Questions about the alternatives
Which alternative is cheapest?
Phone and WhatsApp cost nothing in fees and a great deal in staff time and lost orders at peak. An own ordering site costs a subscription plus gateway and delivery fees and no commission. Which is cheaper depends on your volume; the online ordering cost calculator puts a few setups side by side.
Can I keep WhatsApp and add a website?
Yes, and that is the most common path. Keep the WhatsApp number, but reply to order enquiries with your ordering link so the order arrives typed, paid and with an address rather than as a chat you retype.
Is a marketplace's own white-label ordering page a real alternative?
It reduces commission in some markets and keeps you inside their ecosystem. Whether it counts as an alternative depends on what you want: lower fees, yes, possibly; ownership of the customer and the terms, usually not. Read the specific offer.
What if my POS already offers online ordering?
Then compare it honestly against a standalone site on delivery options, dine-in QR, menu control and the card fees. Square Online and Toast both describe their ordering as commission-free; the fit for your fulfilment model is the question. The platform comparison guide lists what to check.
Can Tuckly handle delivery if I have no drivers?
In the Indian cities Porter serves, you can request a Porter rider for a direct order. Elsewhere, delivery on your own site needs your own drivers, or you offer pickup only. The delivery management page is explicit about what is supported where.
Do I need a developer for any of these?
Not for Tuckly, pickup-only, WhatsApp, or a POS-bundled ordering product. Self-delivery is a staffing decision rather than a technical one. The one place you might want help is connecting a POS, and the status page for each system says what is involved.
Start with the option that costs you nothing to try
Set up an ordering site, put the QR on the bag, and reply to the next WhatsApp order with the link. Keep the marketplace on. See what moves.
Gateway fees, delivery and taxes are separate. Pricing
Last reviewed 29 October 2026.